Essential Milestones in Japanese Medical Education and Data Utilization with Practical Cases from a Regional Medical University

  • Satoshi Ozeki Asahikawa Medical University
  • Sachiko Kasamo Asahikawa Medical University
  • Hiroyasu Inoue Asahikawa Medical University
  • Seiji Matsumoto Asahikawa Medical University
Keywords: Outcome-based education, Japanese medical school, educational data, model core curriculum, milestones


Outcome-based education has recently begun receiving considerable attention to assure the quality of higher education in Japan. Subsequently, institutional research, dealing with data management within an educational institution, has become an essential component of quality assurance. In medical education, institutional research that corresponds to the field is required to satisfy international standards. In Japan, the assurance of the quality of medical education is based on the Model Core Curriculum for Medical Education—the guidelines for establishing medical school curriculums to provide students with the knowledge and skills required by future physicians. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a descriptive overview of Japanese medical education by focusing on milestones indicated by the core curriculum and educational data. First, this paper will provide background knowledge about the current educational policies of Japan and international standards for medical education. Second, it will discuss features of the core curriculum and provide a comprehensive overview of milestones in Japanese medical education and how educational data can be utilized and analyzed. Furthermore, this paper will introduce a case describing the data practices of Asahikawa Medical University to illustrate current efforts toward the effective use of educational data.


The Central Council for Education of Japan, “Grand Design for Higher Education toward 2040 (in Japanese)”, (Accessed Jul. 8, 2021)

The Central Council for Education of Japan, “Guidelines for the Management of Teaching and Learning (in Japanese)”, (Accessed Jul. 8, 2021)

N. Nara, “Significance and Perspective of Medical Education Program Accreditation”, Med Educ Japan, vol 48, no. 6, 2017, pp. 405-410 (in Japanese).

Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, (Accessed May 8, 2021)

Basic Medical Education: Japanese Specifications WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement (in Japanese), (Accessed Jul. 20, 2021)

Y. Asada, “Investigation of the Current Situation of Medical Education in Japan Based on the Results of Accreditation Based on Global Standards”, International Journal of Institutional Research and Management, vol. 4, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-16.

Y. Asada, “The Trend of Institutional Research in Japanese Medical Education: A Case Study

from Jichi Medical University”, International Journal of Institutional Research and Management, vol. 3, no. 2, 2019, pp. 1-18.

Y. Asada and M. S. Yagi, “Moodle for LearningAnalytics and Institutional Research: Exporting Data via SQLs and Plugins”, International Journal of Institutional Research and Management, vol. 4, no. 2, 2020, pp. 30-43.

S. Ozeki, S. Kasamo, H. Inoue, and S. Matsumoto, “Advancing Outcome-Based Education in Japanese Medical Schools: Overview of Milestones and Educational Data”, 2021 10th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 2021, pp. 283-286.

Model Core Curriculum for Medical Education in Japan, AY 2016 Revision,

pdf. (Accessed Jul. 5, 2021)

F. Yagi et al., “Enrollment Selection by Admissions-Office (Attitude-Evaluation) System in Medical School: A Follow-up Survey at the First Year after Admission,” Medical Education Japan, vol 36, no. 3, 2005, pp. 141-152 (in Japanese).

N. Harada and M. Nakamoto, “Student Selection Methods for Medical School and Progress after Admission -Follow-up Study at Yamaguchi University.2- Multivariate Analyses of Factors Influencing Progress after Admission,” Medical Education Japan, vol 28, no. 2, 1997, pp. 77-83 (in Japanese).

S. He et al., “Correlations Between Entrance Examination Scores and Academic Performance Following Admission,” Juntendo Med Journal. vol 61, no. 2, 2015, pp. 142-148.

L. P. Putri, B. G. O’Sullivan, D. J. Russell, and R. Kippen, “Factors Associated with Increasing Rural Doctor Supply in Asia-Pacific Lmics: A Scoping Review,” Human Resources for Health, 2020; doi:10.1186/s12960-020-00533-4.

A. Nakashima et al., “What Factors Affect Examination Results After Admission? : Research at the Fujita Health University School of Medicine,” Medical Education Japan, vol 39, no. 6, 2008, pp. 397-406.

N. Komasawa, F. Terasaki, T. Nakano, and R. Kawata, “Relationships between Objective Structured Clinical Examination, Computer-Based Testing, and Clinical Clerkship Performance in Japanese Medical Students,” PLoS ONE, 2020; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230792.

Developing EPOC2 that Corresponds to the New Clinical Training System (in Japanese), (Accessed Jul. 8, 2021)

Development of Basic Principles and Concepts (in Japanese), (Accessed Dec. 15, 2021)

Status and challenges in initiatives towards seamless physician training (in Japanese), (Accessed Jul. 6, 2021)

Y. Asada et al., “A Moodle-Based E-Syllabus with Database Activity Module”, International Journal of Institutional Research and Management, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, pp. 30-44.

S. Ozeki, T. Hayashi, Y. Saito, M. Fukano, and S. Yamazaki, “An Investigation into Curriculum Management to Accomplish Learning Outcomes in Diploma Policy”, Journal of Japan Association for College and University Education, vol. 43, no. 1, 2021, pp. 140-148 (in Japanese).

Practical Papers