Mediation Effect of the Improvement in Teaching Assistant Quality on Students’ Evaluations of Their FirstYear Experience

  • Mio Tsubakimoto The University of Tokyo
Keywords: first-year experience, learning support, mediation model, student evaluation of teaching, teaching assistant


In Japan, a first-year experience program is required for new university students with diverse academic abilities and motivations. Proper training and utilization of teaching assistants (TAs) is necessary to ensure the quality of higher education. Since 2015, the University of Tokyo has offered a first-year experience program called the “First-Year Seminar,” aimed at promoting problem identifying and solving skills by involving TAs to engage students in the program. However, the causal structure of TAs’ effectiveness in class has not been confirmed. This study aims to verify the causal model from the perspective of educational practice using data from students’ evaluations of teaching. TA training underwent radical reform in 2017. A multi-group mediation analysis between pre- and post-TA training reform showed that the specific and appropriate support actions of the TA affect students and teachers, thereby influencing students’ overall lecture satisfaction. TAs who did not provide enough specific learning support and knowledge had a significantly negative effect on students, faculty, and lecture satisfaction. The educational effects of TA development were found both in selfevaluation by TAs and in the supportive relationships among faculty, students, and TAs. The results of this study demonstrate TAs’ work structure toward their goal of supporting classes.


National Institution for Academic Degrees and Quality Enhancement of Higher Education. Glossary of Quality Assurance in Japanese Higher Education, 4th ed. (2016). Accessed: Apr. 19, 2021. [Online]. Available:

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. “Major Recommendations from the University Council Reports on Teaching Assistants (TAs).” Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (in Japanese) (Accessed Apr. 19, 2021).

OECD. “indicator B4. Who is expected to enter tertiary education?.” Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. (Access ed Apr. 19, 2021).

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. “A summary of basic school survey.” (in Japanese) (Accessed Apr. 19, 2021).

M. Trow, “The Expansion and Transformation of Higher Education,” The Notion of Modern Educational Sociology, vol. 18, no. 1, 1972, pp. 61-84.

R. Ikeda, and Y. Tateoka, Introduction to Peer Learning, Tokyo, Japan: Hituzi Shobo (in Japanese), 2007. ISBN: 978-4894762886.

M. Nakaya, “Children’s Social Responsibility Goal, Learning Behavior, Academic Achievement in Classrooms,” Journal of Educational Psychology; doi: 10.5926/jjep1953.46.3_291. (in Japanese)

S. Nelson-Le Gall, “Help-seeking behavior in learning,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 12, 1985, pp. 55-90.

Goldschmid, B., and Goldschmid, M., “Peer Teaching in Higher Education: A Review,” Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 1976, pp. 9-33.

A. M. Ryan, and H. Shin, “Help-seeking tendencies during early adolescence: An examination of motivational correlates and consequences for achievement,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 21, 2011, pp. 247-256.

The University of Tokyo. “KOMEX Division of First-Year Education.” The University of Tokyo, Komaba. https://www.c.u- (Accessed Apr. 19, 2021).

THE World Universities Insights. “World University Rankings 2021.” Times Higher Education.!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats (Accessed Apr. 19, 2021)

A. Oshio, Psychological and Survey Data Analysis by SPSS and Amos, 3rd ed. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Tosho (in Japanese), 2018. ISBN: 978-4489022913.

P. Comfort, and J. J. McMahon, “The effect of peer tutoring on academic achievement,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 6, 2014, pp.168-175.

B. Uttl, C. A. White, and D. W. Gonzalez, “Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 54, 2017, pp. 22-42.

M. Tsubakimoto, “Prototype of a Rubric for Classifying Teaching Assistants’ Learning Support Behaviors by Social Channels,” unpublished.

Practical Papers