Fuzzy Inference System Based on a Model of Affective Cognitive Criteria for English Learning Achievement

  • Fitra A. Bachtiar Ritsumeikan University
  • Gunadi H. Sulistyo State University of Malang
  • Eric W. Cooper Ritsumeikan University
  • Katsuari Kamei Ritsumeikan University
Keywords: affective, cognitive, fuzzy, inference, fuzzy membership, fuzzy rules


Criterion-referenced assessment (CRA) employs a specifically-defined set of criteria or standards that can guide teachers to assess students grade by comparing students’ learning score with the pre-specified standards. However, the use of CRA is considered incomplete as most of the criteria are merely based on knowledge domains. Meanwhile, affective factors also need to be considered in the assessment to describe students’ complete attributes. Nonetheless, measuring affective factors is not as straightforward task as measuring cognitive factors because affective descriptions is often represented in descriptive verbal terms. In this study, affective factors and cognitive factors based on CRA are combined as a model for assessment of students’ learning. A questionnaire is developed to collect student affective attributes. A novel fuzzy inference system (FIS) is proposed to infer student achievement in English learning based on CRA. The FIS method was applied to analyze the data collected from students studying English as a second language. The result indicates the usefulness of the FIS based on CRA as a basis to assess student English learning by considering both affective and cognitive factors.


J. Salvia and J.E. Ysseldyke, “Assessment” (8th edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2001.

F. M. Cin and A. F. Baba, “Assessment of English proficiency by fuzzy logic approach,”International Educational Technology Conference, 2008, pp. 355–359.

K. M. Tay and C. P. Lim, “A fuzzy inference system-based criterion-referenced assessment model,” Expert System with Applications, Elsevier, vol.38, no. 9, 2011, pp. 11129–11136.

D. R. Sadler, “Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Taylor & Francis, vol. 30, no.2, 2005, pp. 175–194.

S. Saliu, “Constrained subjective assessment of student learning,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, Springer, vol 14, no. 3, 2005, pp 271–284.

J. Biggs, “Teaching for quality learning at university,” Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University, 1999.

M. H. Immordino-Yang and A. Damasio, “We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education,” Mind, brain, and education, Wiley Online Library, vol. 1, no. 1, 2007, pp. 3–10.

K. Shephard, “Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008, pp. 87–98.

L. W. Anderson, et al., “A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition,” White Plains, NY:Longman, 2001.

R. Biswas, “An application of fuzzy sets in students’ evaluation,” Fuzzy sets and systems, Elsevier, vol. 74, no. 2, 1995, pp. 187–194.

S. M. Chen and C. H. Lee, “New methods for students’ evaluation using fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy sets and systems, Elsevier, vol. 104, no. 2, 1999, pp. 209–218.

S. M. Bai, S. M. Chen, “Automatically constructing grade membership functions of fuzzy rules for students evaluation,” Expert Systems with Applications, Elsevier, vol. 35, no. 3, 2008, pp. 1408–1414.

H. Seki, H. Ishii, and M. Mizumoto, “On the monotonicity of fuzzy-inference methods related to T–S inference method,” Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, IEEE, vol. 18, no. 3, 2010, pp. 629–634.

H. Zhao and C. Zhu, “Monotone fuzzy control method and its control performance,” Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2000 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, pp. 3740–3745, 2000.

L. Koczy and K. Hirota, “Ordering, distance and closeness of fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets ´ and Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59, no. 3, 1993, pp. 281–293.

H. D. Brown, “Affective variables in second language acquisition,” Language learning, Wiley Online Library, vol. 23, no. 2, 1973, pp. 231–244.

A. Al-Tamimi, M. Shuib, “Motivation and attitudes towards learning English: A study of petroleum engineering undergraduates at Hadhramout University of Sciences and Technology,” GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, 2009, pp. 29–55.

S. Zafar and K. Meenakshi, “A study on the relationship between extroversionintroversion and risk-taking in the context of second language acquisition,” International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, 2011.

E. K. Horwitz, M. B. Horwitz, and J. Cope, “Foreign language classroom anxiety,” The Modern language journal, Wiley Online Library, vol. 70, no. 2, 1986, pp. 125–132.

F.A. Bachtiar, K. Kamei, E. W. Cooper, “A Neural Network Model of Students’ English Abilities Based on Their Affective Factors in Learning,” Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics (JACIII), vol. 16, no. 3, 2012, pp. 375–380.

L. T. Koczy, K. Hirota, “Size reduction by interpolation in fuzzy rule bases,” Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, IEEE, vol. 27, no. 1, 1997, pp. 14–25.

R. Diao, S. Jin, and Q. Shen, “Antecedent selection in fuzzy rule interpolation using feature selection techniques,” Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 2014, pp. 2206–2213.

H. Ishibuchi, T. Yamamoto, “Fuzzy rule selection by multi-objective genetic local search algorithms and rule evaluation measures in data mining,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Elsevier, vol 141, no. 1, 2004, pp. 59–88.

Technical Papers (Learning Technologies and Learning Environments)