The Effect of Final Consonants in the Cognitive Process of Thai Language

  • Phenpimon Wilairatana Chiba Institute of technology
  • Koichi Mizutani Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology
  • Chanongkorn Kuntonbutr Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi
  • Konosu Tsutomu Chiba Institute of technology
  • Pichit Ngamjarussrichai Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology
Keywords: Thai language, Final Consonants, Information Processing, Cognitive Processing


Written nature of Thai language does not have spaces in a sentence like English and does not have Kanji characters as in Japanese. Words will be written continuously until the end of the sentence the judgement for separate words depends on human decisions. Therefore, cognitive processing is very important to separate words in the Thai language. This research studied the cognitive processing and influence of final consonants in the Thai language by using word identification tasks to verify the difference in time spent answering and correcting data, as there is no direct measurement. Therefore, the time spent on selected word and correctness ratio was the most important variable in the cognitive processing test. The differences of average duration for selected words were analyzed by ANOVA and t-test that is statistical analysis. The results showed that final consonants work as the space in English is used for separating words and sentences and can make the Thai language easier for detect words in Thai language and also reduce the confusion when separating words in the long run on sentences. It works as the accelerator of competency in cognition of Thai language and helps learners to receive more precise and faster information.


Subasic, P., & Huettner, A. (2001). Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy systems, 9(4), 483-496.

Thomas, E. A., & Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 17(4), 363-367.

Fukuda, T. (1992). Visual capability to receive character information: I. How many characters can we recognize at a glance? Ergonomics, 35(5), 617-627.

Ikeda, M., Konosu, T. (2012). Ergonomic study on the information capacity of isolating language without Kanji characters. 4th International Conference on Applied Human factors and Ergonomics, 666.

Kasuriya, S., Sornlertlamvanich, V., Cotsomrong, P., Kanokphara, S., & Thatphithakkul, N. (2003). Thai Speech Recognition Corpora. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing, 14(4), 279-293.

Kasuriya, S., Sornlertlamvanich, V., Cotsomrong, P., Kanokphara, S., & Thatphithakkul, N.(2003). Thai speech corpus for Thai speech recognition. In Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA, 54-61.

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes1. In Psychology of learning and motivation 2, 89-195.

Hinrichs, J. V. (1970). A two-process memory-strength theory for judgment of recency. Psychological Review, 77(3), 223.

Wilpon, J., & Rabiner, L. (1985). A modified K-means clustering algorithm for use in isolated work recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 33(3), 587-594.

Aso, H., & Konosu, T. (2014). Experimental Study on the Effect of Word Dominance of Thai Language. Proceedings of International Conference on Business and Industrial Research, 189- 193.

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.

Technical Papers (Information and Communication Technology)